تفصيل المؤلف
مؤلف O'Neil , Mathieu |
الوثائق الموجودة المؤلفة من طرف المؤلف (1)
Affiner la recherche
Collaborative Internet Governance: Terms and Conditions of Analysis / O'Neil , Mathieu in Revue française d'étude américaines, 134 (Trimestrielle)
[مقالة]
عنوان : Collaborative Internet Governance: Terms and Conditions of Analysis نوع الوثيقة : نص مطبوع مؤلفين : O'Neil , Mathieu, مؤلف تاريخ النشر : 2012 مقالة في الصفحة: P98-P113 اللغة : إنكليزي (eng) الكلمة المفتاح : netroots - distributed governance - collective action - online diffusion - epistemology خلاصة : Online projects are communities of practice which attempt to bypass the hierarchies of everyday life and to create autonomous institutions and forms of organisation. A wealth of theoretical frameworks have been put forward to account for these networked actors' capacity to communicate and self-organise. This article reviews terminology used in Internet research and assesses what it implies for the understanding of regulatory-oriented collective action. In terms of the environment in which interpersonal communication occurs, what differences does it make to speak of "public spheres" or of "public spaces"? In terms of social formations, of "organisations" or "networks"? And in terms of the diffusion of information over the global network, of "contagion" or "trajectories"? Selecting theoretical frames is a momentous decision for researchers, as it authorises or forbids the analysis of different types of behaviour and practices.
in Revue française d'étude américaines > 134 (Trimestrielle) . - P98-P113[مقالة] Collaborative Internet Governance: Terms and Conditions of Analysis [نص مطبوع ] / O'Neil , Mathieu, مؤلف . - 2012 . - P98-P113.
اللغة : إنكليزي (eng)
in Revue française d'étude américaines > 134 (Trimestrielle) . - P98-P113
الكلمة المفتاح : netroots - distributed governance - collective action - online diffusion - epistemology خلاصة : Online projects are communities of practice which attempt to bypass the hierarchies of everyday life and to create autonomous institutions and forms of organisation. A wealth of theoretical frameworks have been put forward to account for these networked actors' capacity to communicate and self-organise. This article reviews terminology used in Internet research and assesses what it implies for the understanding of regulatory-oriented collective action. In terms of the environment in which interpersonal communication occurs, what differences does it make to speak of "public spheres" or of "public spaces"? In terms of social formations, of "organisations" or "networks"? And in terms of the diffusion of information over the global network, of "contagion" or "trajectories"? Selecting theoretical frames is a momentous decision for researchers, as it authorises or forbids the analysis of different types of behaviour and practices.