تفصيل المؤلف
مؤلف Giulo Itzcovich |
الوثائق الموجودة المؤلفة من طرف المؤلف (1)
Affiner la recherche
Comparative constitutional reasoning
عنوان : Comparative constitutional reasoning نوع الوثيقة : نص مطبوع مؤلفين : Andras Jakab, Éditeur scientifique ; Arthur Dyevre, Éditeur scientifique ; Giulo Itzcovich, Éditeur scientifique ناشر : Cambridge : Cambridge university press تاريخ النشر : cop. 2017 عدد الصفحات : 1 vol. (XII-854 p.) Ill. : ill. الأبعاد : 24 cm ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-1-107-08558-9 ثمن : 23998.00 DA. نقطة عامة : Includes bibliographical references and index اللغة : إنكليزي (eng) ترتيب : [كتب باللغة العربية] الكلمة المفتاح : 300 - Sciences sociales Right constitutional تكشيف : 342 القانون الدستوري و القانون الإداري خلاصة : To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate' Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect. نقطة للمضمون : Introduction. Comparing constitutional reasoning with quantitative and qualitative methods /AndraÂs Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich. The High Court of Australia /Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone. The Austrian Constitutional Court /Konrad Lachmayer. The Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil /Conrado HuÈbner Mendes. The Supreme Court of Canada /Hugo Cyr and Monica Popescu. The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic /ZdeneÏk KuÈhn. The European Court of Human Rights /Janneke Gerards. The European Court of Justice /Giulio Itzcovich. The French Constitutional Council /Arthur Dyevre. The German Federal Constitutional Court /Michaela Hailbronner and Stefan Martini. The Constitutional Court of Hungary /AndraÂs Jakab and Johanna FroÈlich. The Supreme Court of Ireland /Eoin Carolan. The Israeli Supreme Court /Suzie Navot. The Constitutional Court of Italy /Tania Groppi and Irene Spigno. The Constitutional Court of South Africa /Christa Rautenbach and Lourens du Plessis. The Spanish Constitutional Court /Marian Ahumada Ruiz. The Constitutional Court of Taiwan /Wen-Chen Chang. The Supreme Court (House of Lords) of the United Kingdom /Tamas Gyorfi. The Supreme Court of the United States /Howard Schweber and Jennifer L. BrookhartConclusionAndraÂs Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich. Comparative constitutional reasoning [نص مطبوع ] / Andras Jakab, Éditeur scientifique ; Arthur Dyevre, Éditeur scientifique ; Giulo Itzcovich, Éditeur scientifique . - Cambridge : Cambridge university press, cop. 2017 . - 1 vol. (XII-854 p.) : ill. ; 24 cm.
ISBN : 978-1-107-08558-9 : 23998.00 DA.
Includes bibliographical references and index
اللغة : إنكليزي (eng)
ترتيب : [كتب باللغة العربية] الكلمة المفتاح : 300 - Sciences sociales Right constitutional تكشيف : 342 القانون الدستوري و القانون الإداري خلاصة : To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate' Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect. نقطة للمضمون : Introduction. Comparing constitutional reasoning with quantitative and qualitative methods /AndraÂs Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich. The High Court of Australia /Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone. The Austrian Constitutional Court /Konrad Lachmayer. The Supreme Federal Tribunal of Brazil /Conrado HuÈbner Mendes. The Supreme Court of Canada /Hugo Cyr and Monica Popescu. The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic /ZdeneÏk KuÈhn. The European Court of Human Rights /Janneke Gerards. The European Court of Justice /Giulio Itzcovich. The French Constitutional Council /Arthur Dyevre. The German Federal Constitutional Court /Michaela Hailbronner and Stefan Martini. The Constitutional Court of Hungary /AndraÂs Jakab and Johanna FroÈlich. The Supreme Court of Ireland /Eoin Carolan. The Israeli Supreme Court /Suzie Navot. The Constitutional Court of Italy /Tania Groppi and Irene Spigno. The Constitutional Court of South Africa /Christa Rautenbach and Lourens du Plessis. The Spanish Constitutional Court /Marian Ahumada Ruiz. The Constitutional Court of Taiwan /Wen-Chen Chang. The Supreme Court (House of Lords) of the United Kingdom /Tamas Gyorfi. The Supreme Court of the United States /Howard Schweber and Jennifer L. BrookhartConclusionAndraÂs Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich. نسخ(2)
Call number Media type Location وضع 342/8/64 Livre Droit جاهز 342/8/64 Livre Droit جاهز