| عنوان : |
A critique of proportionality and balancing |
| نوع الوثيقة : |
نص مخطوط |
| مؤلفين : |
Francisco J,Urbina, Auteur présumé |
| ناشر : |
New York : Cambridge university press |
| تاريخ النشر : |
2017 |
| عدد الصفحات : |
267.p |
| Ill. : |
couverture colorée |
| الأبعاد : |
24. cm |
| ISBN/ISSN/EAN : |
978-1-316-62681-8 |
| ثمن : |
5518.da |
| اللغة : |
إنكليزي (eng) |
| الكلمة المفتاح : |
300-sciences socieles 300-sciences socieles 300-sciences socieles Proportionality in law,Human rights LAW ,Jurisprudence. |
| خلاصة : |
"The principle of proportionality, which has become the standard test for adjudicating human and constitutional rights disputes in jurisdictions worldwide has had few critics. Proportionality is generally taken for granted or enthusiastically promoted or accepted with minor qualifications. A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing presents a frontal challenge to this orthodoxy. It provides a comprehensive critique of the proportionality principle, and particularly of its most characteristic component, balancing. Divided into three parts, the book presents arguments against the proportionality test, critiques the view of rights entailed by it, and proposes an alternative understanding of fundamental rights and their limits" |
A critique of proportionality and balancing [نص مخطوط] / Francisco J,Urbina, Auteur présumé . - New York : Cambridge university press, 2017 . - 267.p : couverture colorée ; 24. cm. ISBN : 978-1-316-62681-8 : 5518.da اللغة : إنكليزي ( eng)
| الكلمة المفتاح : |
300-sciences socieles 300-sciences socieles 300-sciences socieles Proportionality in law,Human rights LAW ,Jurisprudence. |
| خلاصة : |
"The principle of proportionality, which has become the standard test for adjudicating human and constitutional rights disputes in jurisdictions worldwide has had few critics. Proportionality is generally taken for granted or enthusiastically promoted or accepted with minor qualifications. A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing presents a frontal challenge to this orthodoxy. It provides a comprehensive critique of the proportionality principle, and particularly of its most characteristic component, balancing. Divided into three parts, the book presents arguments against the proportionality test, critiques the view of rights entailed by it, and proposes an alternative understanding of fundamental rights and their limits" |
|
Affiner la recherche
